Are there ways to improve the citations of a scientific paper?
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29395937.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.12.006.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The expansion of scientific publications makes more difficult the mining of relevant information necessary for a productive appraisal of authors' work, scientific interaction and exchange. Papers over-citation is unproductive, under-citation of innovative research generates delay and inefficiency. The extraction of information from the literature is mostly based on keywords (KWs). METHODS: I computed the chances of citation of one paper as 1/number of papers retrieved by the KWs published in that paper, and compared them with the chances obtained by selecting different KWs. RESULTS: Using generic KWs the chances are smaller, at times practically nil, as compared to those calculated with more specific KWs and their association. CONCLUSIONS: Selecting scientifically-analyzed KWs, specific for the message conveyed by a paper and computing beforehand the theoretical chances of citation, might increase the citations obtained, the retrieval of important scientific and innovative information, optimize scientific exchange and qualitative productivity. LEARNING POINTS.