Teaching of distal radius shortening osteotomy: three-dimensional procedural simulator versus bone procedural simulator.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29402172.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/1753193417754179.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In order to facilitate the learning of distal radius shortening osteotomy by junior surgeons, the main assumption was that using a three-dimensional procedural simulator was better than a bone procedural simulator. After viewing a video, ten junior surgeons performed a distal radius shortening osteotomy: five with a bone procedural simulator (Group 1) and five with a three-dimensional procedural simulator (Group 2). All subsequently performed the same surgery on fresh cadaveric bones. The duration of the procedure, shortening of the radius, and the level of osteotomy were significantly better in Group 2. The three-dimensional procedural simulator seems to teach distal radius osteotomy better than a bone model and could be useful in teaching and learning bone surgery of the wrist.
Medical subject headings
- Osteotomy
- Radius
- Simulation Training
Anatomy
- radius