What Metrics Accurately Reflect Surgical Quality?
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29414254.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1146/annurev-med-060116-022805.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Surgeons are increasingly under pressure to measure and improve their quality. While there is broad consensus that we ought to track surgical quality, there is far less agreement about which metrics matter most. This article reviews the important statistical concepts of case mix and chance as they apply to understanding the observed wide variation in surgical quality. We then discuss the benefits and drawbacks of current measurement strategies through the framework of structure, process, and outcomes approaches. Finally, we describe emerging new metrics, such as video evaluation and network optimization, that are likely to take on an increasingly important role in the future of measuring surgical quality.
Medical subject headings
- Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
- Quality Indicators, Health Care
- Quality of Health Care
- Surgical Procedures, Operative