Barriers to Epineural Scarring: Role in Treatment of Traumatic Nerve Injury and Chronic Compressive Neuropathy.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29482956.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.01.013 and PMC identifier 5886816.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The physiological limitations of neural regeneration make peripheral nerve surgery challenging to both the surgeon and the patient. Presence of nerve gaps and local wound factors may all influence outcome, suggesting that barriers to reduce perineural scarring, minimize fibrosis, and avoid ischemia would be beneficial. To examine the evidence supporting their use, we reviewed the autologous and commercially-available options for barriers against scarring around a nerve. Numerous clinical case series demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of local/rotational flaps and autologous vein wrapping when used in the presence of recurrent compressive neuropathy. Translational research in animal models supports the biocompatibility of commercially available nerve wraps following nerve repair. To date, there are no reports of clinical use of commercially available nerve wraps in acute nerve repair, but a growing number of case series demonstrate their effectiveness and safety in chronic compressive neuropathy. Limited clinical evidence exists to support the efficacy of vein or flap coverage in acute nerve repairs.
Medical subject headings
- Cicatrix
- Nerve Compression Syndromes
- Neurosurgical Procedures
- Peripheral Nerves