What We Have Learned From the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29501371.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.02.016 and PMC identifier 5915899.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To identify results from the Ocular Hypertension Study that can aid patients and clinicians to make evidence-based decisions about the management of ocular hypertension. Perspective. At 60 months, the cumulative frequency of developing primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) was 4.4% in the medication group and 9.5% in the observation group (hazard ratio for medication, 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.59; P < .0001). At 13 years the cumulative proportion of participants who developed POAG was 0.22 (95% CI 0.19-0.25) in the original observation group and 0.16 (95% CI 0.13-0.19) in the original medication group (complementary log-log x<sup>2</sup>P = .009). A 5-factor model (older age, higher IOP, thinner central corneal thickness, larger cup-to-disc ratio, and higher visual field pattern standard deviation) separated participants at high and low risk of developing POAG. Clinicians and patients can make evidence-based decisions about the management of ocular hypertension using the risk model and considering patient age, medical status, life expectancy, and personal preference.
Medical subject headings
- Ocular Hypertension