Optimal Target Range of Closed-Loop Inspired Oxygen Support in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Cross-Over Study.

van den Heuvel, Maria Elisabeth Nicoletta; van Zanten, Henriette A; Bachman, Tom E; Te Pas, Arjan B; van Kaam, Anton H; Onland, Wes · J Pediatr · 2018

rct · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

To investigate the effect of different pulse oximetry (SpO<sub>2</sub>) target range settings during automated fraction of inspired oxygen control (A-FiO<sub>2</sub>) on time spent within a clinically set SpO<sub>2</sub> alarm range in oxygen-dependent infants on noninvasive respiratory support. Forty-one preterm infants (gestational age [median] 26 weeks, age [median] 21 days) on FiO<sub>2</sub> >0.21 receiving noninvasive respiratory support were subjected to A-FiO<sub>2</sub> using 3 SpO<sub>2</sub> target ranges (86%-94%, 88%-92%, or 89%-91%) in random order for 24 hours each. Before switching to the next target range, SpO<sub>2</sub> was manually controlled for 24 hours (washout period). The primary outcome was the time spent within the clinically set alarm limits of 86%-94%. The percent time within the 86%-94% SpO<sub>2</sub> alarm range was similar for all 3 A-FiO<sub>2</sub> target ranges (74%). Time spent in hyperoxemia was not significantly different between target ranges. However, the time spent in severe hypoxemia (SpO<sub>2</sub> <80%) was significantly reduced during the narrowed target ranges of A-FiO<sub>2</sub> (88%-92%; 1.9%, 89%-91%; 1.7%) compared with the wide target range (86%-94%; 3.4%, P < .001). There were no differences between the 88%-92% and 89-91% target range. Narrowing the target range of A-FiO<sub>2</sub> to the desired median ±2% is effective in reducing the time spent in hypoxemia, without increasing the risk of hyperoxemia. www.trialregister.nl: NTR4368.

Medical subject headings