High Rate of Failure After Revision of a Constrained Liner.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29705682.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.042.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of repeat revision after failure of a constrained liner. We reviewed 1212 consecutive revisions and identified 74 (6%) revisions of a failed constrained liner in 46 patients with a mean age of 65 years. The most common reasons for revision of a constrained liner were recurrent instability (64.9%) and infection (25.7%). At a mean of 35 months, 42 of the 74 hips (57%) required repeat revision. Kaplan-Meier revision-free survival was 24% at 10 years. Thirty-two of the 74 revisions (43%) had a dislocation event after the index revision. Kaplan-Meier dislocation-free survival was 43% at 10 years. There was a higher failure rate among the 34 patients with abductor deficiency (hazard ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval, 1.06-3.43; P = .032). Patients undergoing revision of a failed constrained liner have a high likelihood of recurrent dislocation and repeat revision surgery. Level IV.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Prosthesis
- Prosthesis Design
- Prosthesis Failure
- Reoperation
Anatomy
- hip