Comparison of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer patients prior to radionuclide therapy.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29766246.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00259-018-4048-6.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer (PC) patients scheduled for radionuclide therapy in comparison to [<sup>18</sup>F]sodium fluoride (<sup>18</sup>F-NaF) PET/CT. Sixteen metastatic PC patients with known skeletal metastases, who underwent both <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT for assessment of metastatic burden prior to radionuclide therapy, were analysed retrospectively. The performance of both tracers was calculated on a lesion-based comparison. Intensity of tracer accumulation of pathologic bone lesions on <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET was measured with maximum standardized uptake values (SUV<sub>max</sub>) and compared to background activity of normal bone. In addition, SUV<sub>max</sub> values of PET-positive bone lesions were analysed with respect to morphologic characteristics on CT. Bone metastases were either confirmed by CT or follow-up PET scan. In contrast to 468 PET-positive lesions suggestive of bone metastases on <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET, only 351 of the lesions were also judged positive on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET (75.0%). Intensity of tracer accumulation of pathologic skeletal lesions was significantly higher on <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET compared to <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET, showing a median SUV<sub>max</sub> of 27.0 and 6.0, respectively (p < 0.001). Background activity of normal bone was lower on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET, with a median SUV<sub>max</sub> of 1.0 in comparison to 2.7 on <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET; however, tumour to background ratio was significantly higher on <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET (9.8 versus 5.9 on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET; p = 0.042). Based on morphologic lesion characterisation on CT, <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET revealed median SUV<sub>max</sub> values of 23.6 for osteosclerotic, 35.0 for osteolytic, and 19.0 for lesions not visible on CT, whereas on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET median SUV<sub>max</sub> values of 5.0 in osteosclerotic, 29.5 in osteolytic, and 7.5 in lesions not seen on CT were measured. Intensity of tracer accumulation between<sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET was significantly higher in osteosclerotic (p < 0.001) and lesions not visible on CT (p = 0.012). In comparison to <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT detects a higher number of pathologic bone lesions in advanced stage PC patients scheduled for radionuclide therapy. Our data suggest that <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET should be combined with <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET in PC patients with skeletal metastases for restaging prior to initiation or modification of therapy.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Neoplasms
- Edetic Acid
- Fluorine Radioisotopes
- Oligopeptides
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Sodium Fluoride