Comparison of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer patients prior to radionuclide therapy.

Uprimny, Christian; Svirydenka, Anna; Fritz, Josef; Kroiss, Alexander Stephan; Nilica, Bernhard; Decristoforo, Clemens; Haubner, Roland; von Guggenberg, Elisabeth et al. · Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging · 2018

retrospective_cohort · Level III

Where this comes from

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer (PC) patients scheduled for radionuclide therapy in comparison to [<sup>18</sup>F]sodium fluoride (<sup>18</sup>F-NaF) PET/CT. Sixteen metastatic PC patients with known skeletal metastases, who underwent both <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT for assessment of metastatic burden prior to radionuclide therapy, were analysed retrospectively. The performance of both tracers was calculated on a lesion-based comparison. Intensity of tracer accumulation of pathologic bone lesions on <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET was measured with maximum standardized uptake values (SUV<sub>max</sub>) and compared to background activity of normal bone. In addition, SUV<sub>max</sub> values of PET-positive bone lesions were analysed with respect to morphologic characteristics on CT. Bone metastases were either confirmed by CT or follow-up PET scan. In contrast to 468 PET-positive lesions suggestive of bone metastases on <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET, only 351 of the lesions were also judged positive on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET (75.0%). Intensity of tracer accumulation of pathologic skeletal lesions was significantly higher on <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET compared to <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET, showing a median SUV<sub>max</sub> of 27.0 and 6.0, respectively (p < 0.001). Background activity of normal bone was lower on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET, with a median SUV<sub>max</sub> of 1.0 in comparison to 2.7 on <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET; however, tumour to background ratio was significantly higher on <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET (9.8 versus 5.9 on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET; p = 0.042). Based on morphologic lesion characterisation on CT, <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET revealed median SUV<sub>max</sub> values of 23.6 for osteosclerotic, 35.0 for osteolytic, and 19.0 for lesions not visible on CT, whereas on <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET median SUV<sub>max</sub> values of 5.0 in osteosclerotic, 29.5 in osteolytic, and 7.5 in lesions not seen on CT were measured. Intensity of tracer accumulation between<sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET and <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET was significantly higher in osteosclerotic (p < 0.001) and lesions not visible on CT (p = 0.012). In comparison to <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT detects a higher number of pathologic bone lesions in advanced stage PC patients scheduled for radionuclide therapy. Our data suggest that <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET should be combined with <sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET in PC patients with skeletal metastases for restaging prior to initiation or modification of therapy.

Medical subject headings