Using preference learning for detecting inconsistencies in clinical practice guidelines: Methods and application to antibiotherapy.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29776758.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.artmed.2018.04.013.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations. However, many problems are reported, such as contradictions and inconsistencies. For example, guidelines recommend sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim in child sinusitis, but they also state that there is a high bacteria resistance in this context. In this paper, we propose a method for the semi-automatic detection of inconsistencies in guidelines using preference learning, and we apply this method to antibiotherapy in primary care. The preference model was learned from the recommendations and from a knowledge base describing the domain. We successfully built a generic model suitable for all infectious diseases and patient profiles. This model includes both preferences and necessary features. It allowed the detection of 106 candidate inconsistencies which were analyzed by a medical expert. 55 inconsistencies were validated. We showed that therapeutic strategies of guidelines in antibiotherapy can be formalized by a preference model. In conclusion, we proposed an original approach, based on preferences, for modeling clinical guidelines. This model could be used in future clinical decision support systems for helping physicians to prescribe antibiotics.
Medical subject headings
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Bacterial Infections
- Data Mining
- Guideline Adherence
- Machine Learning
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'