Mechanical Performance of Two Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Systems: In Vitro Comparison of Tug Force, Radial Force, Sealing and Deformation.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29797140.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s10439-018-2057-z.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to establish in vitro bench-tests of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAo) devices regarding tug force, radial force and sealing capacity. Two LAAo devices, namely the WATCHMAN™ and the Occlutech<sup>®</sup>, of three different sizes underwent testing in novel dedicated in vitro setups. Radial force was assessed in a commercial radial force tester. At baseline, tug force of the WATCHMAN™ was significantly higher when compared to Occlutech<sup>®</sup> for all devices. Repeated resheathing resulted in a reduction of device-diameter in the WATCHMAN™ devices of max. 7.9%, whereas diameters of Occlutech<sup>®</sup> occluders remained unchanged. Tug force was not significantly impacted by resheathing in both devices. At baseline, sealing capacity in a bench-test using silicone LAA-models did not differ between the devices. Resheathing lead to an in vitro loss of sealing capacity of the WATCHMAN™ devices, increasing with resheathing and resulting in a max. peridevice leak of 91.1 ± 7.9%. Radial force was higher for the Occlutech<sup>®</sup> devices and decreased for WATCHMAN™ occluders after resheathing. The WATCHMAN™ occluder series showed progressive deformation, increased peridevice leakage and decreased radial force after resheathing, presumably as a result of diameter reduction. Tug force of the WATCHMAN™ was not impaired by resheathing and was significantly higher than that of the Occlutech<sup>®</sup> device.
Medical subject headings
- Atrial Appendage
- Septal Occluder Device