Editorial Commentary: Hype, Hope and Everything in Between. What Produces the Real Effect for Blood-derived Products Including Platelet-Rich Plasma?
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29804615.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.02.026.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Biological approaches have a promising future in the orthopaedic field because of their potential benefits that include their minimal invasiveness, potential for accelerated healing, and promise for rapid recovery. However, as the initial hype for these therapies starts to fade, it should be replaced by solid basic and clinical science research to tailor each compound to a determined patient/pathology. Blood contains several products that can be both beneficial and detrimental for every specific tissue, and therefore a one-fits-all approach should be avoided. Although beneficial effects have been consistently reported for certain pathologies such as lateral elbow tendinopathy, as an adjunct for rotator cuff repairs and the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis, other conditions' outcomes with biologic treatment remain nebulous such as for Achilles tendinopathy. To determine the real effect of these therapies, it is important to maintain strict inclusion criteria in an attempt to isolate the effect of one biologic product that already has many inherent intrinsic variables per se.
Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis
- Platelet-Rich Plasma
- Tendinopathy
- Tendon Injuries