Subjective and objective comparisons of image quality between ultra-high-resolution CT and conventional area detector CT in phantoms and cadaveric human lungs.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29845337.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5491-2 and PMC identifier 6223853.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
To compare the image quality of the lungs between ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) and conventional area detector CT (AD-CT) images. Image data of slit phantoms (0.35, 0.30, and 0.15 mm) and 11 cadaveric human lungs were acquired by both U-HRCT and AD-CT devices. U-HRCT images were obtained with three acquisition modes: normal mode (U-HRCT<sub>N</sub>: 896 channels, 0.5 mm × 80 rows; 512 matrix), super-high-resolution mode (U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub>: 1792 channels, 0.25 mm × 160 rows; 1024 matrix), and volume mode (U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub>: non-helical acquisition with U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub>). AD-CT images were obtained with the same conditions as U-HRCT<sub>N</sub>. Three independent observers scored normal anatomical structures (vessels and bronchi), abnormal CT findings (faint nodules, solid nodules, ground-glass opacity, consolidation, emphysema, interlobular septal thickening, intralobular reticular opacities, bronchovascular bundle thickening, bronchiectasis, and honeycombing), noise, artifacts, and overall image quality on a 3-point scale (1 = worst, 2 = equal, 3 = best) compared with U-HRCT<sub>N</sub>. Noise values were calculated quantitatively. U-HRCT could depict a 0.15-mm slit. Both U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub> and U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub> significantly improved visualization of normal anatomical structures and abnormal CT findings, except for intralobular reticular opacities and reduced artifacts, compared with AD-CT (p < 0.014). Visually, U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub> has less noise than U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub> and AD-CT (p < 0.00001). Quantitative noise values were significantly higher in the following order: U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub> (mean, 30.41), U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub> (26.84), AD-CT (16.03), and U-HRCT<sub>N</sub> (15.14) (p < 0.0001). U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub> and U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub> resulted in significantly higher overall image quality than AD-CT and were almost equal to U-HRCT<sub>N</sub> (p < 0.0001). Both U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub> and U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub> can provide higher image quality than AD-CT, while U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub> was less noisy than U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub>. • Ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) can improve spatial resolution. • U-HRCT can reduce streak and dark band artifacts. • U-HRCT can provide higher image quality than conventional area detector CT. • In U-HRCT, the volume mode is less noisy than the super-high-resolution mode. • U-HRCT may provide more detailed information about the lung anatomy and pathology.
Medical subject headings
- Lung
- Lung Diseases
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed