Subjective and objective comparisons of image quality between ultra-high-resolution CT and conventional area detector CT in phantoms and cadaveric human lungs.

Yanagawa, Masahiro; Hata, Akinori; Honda, Osamu; Kikuchi, Noriko; Miyata, Tomo; Uranishi, Ayumi; Tsukagoshi, Shinsuke; Tomiyama, Noriyuki · Eur Radiol · 2018

biomechanical · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

To compare the image quality of the lungs between ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) and conventional area detector CT (AD-CT) images. Image data of slit phantoms (0.35, 0.30, and 0.15 mm) and 11 cadaveric human lungs were acquired by both U-HRCT and AD-CT devices. U-HRCT images were obtained with three acquisition modes: normal mode (U-HRCT<sub>N</sub>: 896 channels, 0.5 mm × 80 rows; 512 matrix), super-high-resolution mode (U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub>: 1792 channels, 0.25 mm × 160 rows; 1024 matrix), and volume mode (U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub>: non-helical acquisition with U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub>). AD-CT images were obtained with the same conditions as U-HRCT<sub>N</sub>. Three independent observers scored normal anatomical structures (vessels and bronchi), abnormal CT findings (faint nodules, solid nodules, ground-glass opacity, consolidation, emphysema, interlobular septal thickening, intralobular reticular opacities, bronchovascular bundle thickening, bronchiectasis, and honeycombing), noise, artifacts, and overall image quality on a 3-point scale (1 = worst, 2 = equal, 3 = best) compared with U-HRCT<sub>N</sub>. Noise values were calculated quantitatively. U-HRCT could depict a 0.15-mm slit. Both U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub> and U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub> significantly improved visualization of normal anatomical structures and abnormal CT findings, except for intralobular reticular opacities and reduced artifacts, compared with AD-CT (p < 0.014). Visually, U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub> has less noise than U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub> and AD-CT (p < 0.00001). Quantitative noise values were significantly higher in the following order: U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub> (mean, 30.41), U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub> (26.84), AD-CT (16.03), and U-HRCT<sub>N</sub> (15.14) (p < 0.0001). U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub> and U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub> resulted in significantly higher overall image quality than AD-CT and were almost equal to U-HRCT<sub>N</sub> (p < 0.0001). Both U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub> and U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub> can provide higher image quality than AD-CT, while U-HRCT<sub>SHR-VOL</sub> was less noisy than U-HRCT<sub>SHR</sub>. • Ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT) can improve spatial resolution. • U-HRCT can reduce streak and dark band artifacts. • U-HRCT can provide higher image quality than conventional area detector CT. • In U-HRCT, the volume mode is less noisy than the super-high-resolution mode. • U-HRCT may provide more detailed information about the lung anatomy and pathology.

Medical subject headings