Impact of dual-energy CT post-processing to differentiate venous thrombosis from iodine flux artefacts.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29869173.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5534-8.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To investigate the accuracy of dual-energy (DE) CT-based iodine maps (IM) and noise-optimised monoenergetic extrapolations (MEI+) at 40 keV for the detection and differentiation of venous thrombosis (VT) from iodine flux artefacts (IFA) in comparison to portal-venous phase CT (CT<sub>PV</sub>). Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in this study. In all patients, VT or IFA was suspected on contrast-enhanced CT and confirmed by follow-up CT or colour-coded ultrasound. All examinations were performed on a third-generation dual-source CT system in DE mode during portal-venous phase. CT<sub>PV</sub>, IM and 40-keV MEI+ were reconstructed and independently evaluated by two radiologists for the presence/absence of VT and/or IFA. Diagnostic confidence was rated on a three-point scale (3 = high confidence). Quantitative parameters were obtained by calculating contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), iodine content and thrombus volume. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by calculating receiver operating characteristics (ROC) of CNR. Diagnostic confidence was significantly higher for IM and MEI+ [both 3 (2-3)] compared to CT<sub>PV</sub> [2 (1-3); p ≤ 0.03]. ROC analysis revealed significantly higher AUC values and increased sensitivity for IM and MEI+ (AUC = 88%/sensitivity = 79.1% and 86%/73.1%) than for CT<sub>PV</sub> (75%/61.2%; p ≤ 0.01). Thrombus volume was significantly higher in MEI+ than in IM and CT<sub>PV</sub> (p < 0.001). CNR of thrombosis was significantly higher in IM [11.5 (8.5-14.5), p < 0.001) and MEI+ [10.9 (8.8-15.5), p < 0.001] than in CT<sub>PV</sub> [8.2 (5.8-11.4)]. Iodine quantification revealed significantly lower results in VT than in IFA [0.55 mg/ml (0.23-0.90) and 1.81 (1.60-2.12) mg/ml; p < 0.001]. IM and MEI+ 40 keV showed significantly higher diagnostic confidence and accuracy for the detection and differentiation of VT from IFA in comparison to CT<sub>PV</sub>. • Iodine maps and noise-optimised monoenergetic extrapolations at 40 keV increase diagnostic confidence and accuracy for the detection and differentiation of venous thrombosis from iodine flux artefacts. • Dual-energy post-processing can significantly increase contrast-to-noise ratio and the sensitivity for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis • Iodine load in venous thrombosis is significantly lower than in iodine flux artefacts.
Medical subject headings
- Artifacts
- Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Venous Thrombosis