Towards developing an ethical framework for decision making in long-term ventilation in children.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29871903.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314997.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The use of long-term ventilation (LTV) in children is growing in the UK and worldwide. This reflects the improvement in technology to provide LTV, the growing number of indications in which it can be successfully delivered and the acceptability of LTV to families and children. In this article, we discuss the various considerations to be made when deciding to initiate or continue LTV, describe the process that <i>should</i> be followed, as decided by a consensus of experienced physicians, and outline the options available for resolution of conflict around LTV decision making. We recognise the uncertainty and hope provided by novel and evolving therapies for potential disease modification. This raises the question of whether LTV should be offered to allow time for a therapy to be trialled, or whether the therapy is <i>so</i> unlikely to be effective, LTV would simply prolong suffering. We put this consensus view forward as an ethical framework for decision making in children requiring LTV.
Medical subject headings
- Clinical Decision-Making
- Decision Making
- Home Care Services, Hospital-Based
- Parents
- Professional-Family Relations
- Respiration, Artificial
- Respiratory Insufficiency