Session 2: Synchronous metastatic disease-liver first or primary first? The oncologist decides.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29878683.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/codi.14080.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
There have been no randomized trial data to guide teams with regard to the order of surgery in patients with synchronous metastatic disease. On the one hand patients with borderline resectable liver metastases may lose the opportunity to undergo curative liver resection if the primary is resected first. For other patients, a symptomatic primary cancer may not be amenable to a delay. In the absence of clear evidence-based outcomes, Professor Van Cutsem shares the recent expert consensus opinions on the current recommendations and an overview of the limited evidence base available.
Medical subject headings
- Clinical Decision-Making
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Hepatectomy
- Liver Neoplasms
- Neoplasms, Multiple Primary