Benefits of hardware removal after plating.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29929702.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/S0020-1383(18)30311-5.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Routine implant removal is frequently performed although evidence-based guidelines are lacking. But routinely planned implant removal has significant economic implications and shows considerable complication rates. In general, clinical outcome seems to improve but pain relief after operation is often unpredictable. Even in patients reporting implant-related pain, implant removal does not guarantee relief and may be associated with further complications. The intra- and postoperative complication rate remains very high. Implant removal demonstrates a significant learning curve and unsupervised junior surgeons tend to cause more complications. The need for implant removal may be questioned. Even with the implant in place, contact activities can be resumed. However, a new adequate trauma can create a new fracture independently if there is an implant in-situ or not. It is important to understand the complications and outcomes to be expected with hardware removal to carefully evaluate its indication.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Plates
- Device Removal
- Fracture Fixation, Internal
- Fractures, Bone
- Postoperative Complications
- Prostheses and Implants