Cost-effective but clinically inappropriate: new NICE intervention thresholds in osteoporosis (Technology Appraisal 464).
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29947864.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00198-018-4505-x and PMC identifier 6037288.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To comment on the latest technology appraisal of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in osteoporosis. Review of NICE Technology Appraisal (TA464) on bisphosphonate use in osteoporosis. The NICE appraisal on bisphosphonate use in osteoporosis indicates that treatment with oral bisphosphonates may be instituted at a FRAX 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture above 1%. Implementation would mean that all women aged 50 years or older are deemed eligible for treatment, a position that would increase the burden of rare long-term side effects across the population. Cost-effectiveness thresholds for low-cost interventions should not be used to set intervention thresholds but rather to validate the implementation of clinically driven intervention thresholds.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Density Conservation Agents
- Osteoporosis
- Osteoporotic Fractures