Percutaneous versus open reduction and fixation for Tillaux and triplane fractures: a multicenter cohort comparison study.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29957617.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000522.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to compare open reduction versus percutaneous fixation of adolescent ankle fractures with regards to the incidence of growth disturbance. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of adolescent patients with triplane or Tillaux fractures. There was an even distribution of triplane fractures and mean initial displacement between cohorts. Analysis of follow-up radiographs revealed no instances of growth disturbance in the percutaneous fixation group and six in the open reduction group (P=0.29). Growth disturbance does not pose a significant concern when selecting a surgical approach. Owing to the rarity of these fractures this study was underpowered.
Medical subject headings
- Fracture Fixation
- Open Fracture Reduction
- Tibial Fractures
Anatomy
- tibia