Can a Brief Training Session Prepare Physician Sonographers of Differing Experience to Measure the Ischiofemoral Space? A Reliability Study.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29964210.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.06.014.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The primary aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intrarater reliability of ultrasound (US) measurements of the ischiofemoral space (IFS) following a brief training session. A secondary aim was to determine if reliability correlated with sonographer experience. Prospective cohort study. Physical medicine and rehabilitation department within a tertiary care institution. Seven male and 3 female individuals were recruited to serve as models. Nine physician sonographers (3 postgraduate year [PGY]-2 residents, 3 PGY-4 residents, 3 physicians) were recruited to serve as sonographers. Sonographers received a 15-minute educational session on identifying the IFS with US, followed by 20 minutes of practice. Models were then placed in a prone position and secured to prevent hip movement. All operators measured bilateral IFSs in each model twice with a washout period between measurements. Operators were blinded to all measurements. Primary outcomes were inter- and intrarater reliability interclass coefficients (ICCs) of IFS measurements among the groups with different levels of US experience. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of inter- and intrarater reliability ICCs of IFS measurements between groups, and the difference of mean IFS measurements between groups. Intrarater reliability ICCs were 0.829, 0.680, and 0.596 for physician, PGY-4, and PGY-2 groups, respectively. Interrater reliability ICCs were 0.722, 0.427, and 0.558 for physician, PGY-4, and PGY-2 groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences in reliability were identified between groups. Mean IFS measurements were 31.2, 33.4, and 34.0 mm for physician, PGY-4, and PGY-2 groups, respectively. Physician measurements were significantly smaller than the PGY-4 and PGY-2 measurements (P < .049 and P < .01). Following a brief training session, experienced sonographers demonstrated excellent IFS measurement intrarater reliability, whereas PGY-4 and PGY-2 sonographers demonstrated fair intrarater reliability. All sonographers demonstrated fair interrater reliability. II.
Medical subject headings
- Clinical Competence
- Education, Medical, Graduate
- Hip Joint
- Patient Positioning
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
- Physicians
- Ultrasonography