Lumbar Lordosis Correction with Interbody Fusion: Systematic Literature Review and Analysis.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 29981462.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.216.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to conduct an evidence-based quantitative assessment of the correction of lumbar lordosis achieved by each of the 3 principal lumbar interbody fusion techniques: anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (L-LIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify studies containing degrees of correction of lumbar lordosis achieved by ALIF, L-LIF, and TLIF as shown on standing lumbar radiography at least 6 weeks after surgical intervention. Pooled and Forest plot analyses were performed for the studies that met inclusion criteria. For ALIF, 21 studies were identified with mean correction 4.67° (standard deviation [SD] ± 4.24) and median correction 5.20°. Fifteen studies were identified that met criteria for Forest plot analysis with mean correction 4.90° (standard error of the mean [SEM] ± 0.40). For L-LIF, 17 studies were identified with mean correction 4.47° (SD ± 4.80) and median correction 4.00°. Nine studies were identified that met criteria for Forest plot analysis with mean correction 2.91° (SEM ± 0.56). For TLIF, 31 studies were identified with mean correction 3.89° (SD ± 4.33) and median correction 3.50°. Twenty-five studies were identified that met criteria for Forest plot analysis with mean correction 5.33° (SEM ± 0.27). We present the current evidence-based mean correction for each of the 3 principal lumbar interbody fusion techniques based on standing radiographic data.
Medical subject headings
- Lordosis
- Lumbar Vertebrae
- Spinal Fusion