Accelerating implementation of shared decision-making in the Netherlands: An exploratory investigation.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30006242.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.021.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To prioritize strategies to implement shared decision-making (SDM) in daily practice, resulting in an agenda for a nationwide approach. This was a qualitative, exploratory investigation involving: Interviews (N = 43) to elicit perceived barriers to and facilitators of change, focus group discussions (N = 51) to develop an implementation strategy, and re-affirmation through written feedback (n = 19). Professionals, patients, researchers and policymakers from different healthcare sectors participated. Determinants for change were addressed at four implementation levels: (1) the concept of SDM, (2) clinician and/or patient, (3) organizational context and (4) socio-political context. Following the identification of perceived barriers, four strategies were proposed to scale up SDM: 1) stimulating intrinsic motivation among clinicians via an integrated programmatic approach, 2) training and implementation in routine practice, 3) stimulating the empowerment of patients, 4) creating an enabling socio-political context. Clinicians mentioned that applying SDM makes their job more rewarding and indicated that implementation in daily practice needs ground-up redesign. The challenge is to effectively influence the behavior of clinicians and patients alike, and adapt clinical pathways to facilitate the exploration of patient values. Stakeholders should connect nationwide initiatives to pool information, and make the healthcare system supportive of implementing SDM.
Medical subject headings
- Communication
- Decision Making
- Delivery of Health Care
- Patient Participation
- Patient-Centered Care