Hybrid Achilles Tendon Repair.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30013904.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.eats.2018.02.011 and PMC identifier 6019910.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture, recent studies demonstrate that conservative treatment with functional rehabilitation provides good results, with nearly identical postoperative rerupture rates when compared with surgical treatment. Surgical treatment is indicated in patients with particular conditions, such as patients who are young active athletes who require early return to play or those who wish to avoid the muscle atrophy associated with conservative methods. If surgery is the selected option for treatment, the postoperative complications of each type of surgery must be considered. In conventional open repair, the most common complication is soft-tissue infection due to the high tension of soft tissue affected from the bowstring of the repaired tendon being kept in the equinus position of the ankle. For percutaneous methods, sural nerve entrapment and injury are the most commonly reported complications. Other methods, including endoscopy, require technical expertise as well as special equipment. Several types of combination approaches have been explored in the literature. We describe a combined open and percutaneous technique to repair the Achilles tendon, called the hybrid Achilles tendon repair. This technique has been developed to provide a simplified and reproducible method of hybrid repair in which the complications of previous methods are avoided and which can be done without special equipment.