Various experiences and preferences of Dutch parents in prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30029812.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.003.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To investigate experienced and preferred prenatal counseling among parents of extremely premature babies. A Dutch nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional study using an online survey. Surveys were sent to all parents of extremely premature babies born between 2010 and 2013 at 24<sup>+0/7</sup>-24<sup>+6/7</sup> weeks of gestation. Sixty-one out of 229 surveys were returned. A minority (14%) had no counseling conversation. Conversations were done more often by neonatologists (90%) than by obstetricians (39%) and in 37% by both these experts. Supportive material was rarely used (19%). Mortality (92%) and short-term morbidity (88%) were discussed the most, and more frequently than long-term morbidity (65%), practical items (63%) and delivery mode (52%). Most decisions on active care or palliative comfort care were perceived as decisions by doctor and parents together (61%). 80% felt they were involved in decision-making. The preferred way of involvement in decision-making varied among parents. The vast majority of parents were counseled: mostly by neonatologists, and mainly about mortality and short-term morbidity. Parents wanted to be involved in the decision-making process but differed on the preferred extent of involvement. Practice implications Understanding of shared decision-making may contribute to meet the various preferences of parents.
Medical subject headings
- Decision Making
- Directive Counseling
- Infant, Extremely Premature
- Neonatology
- Parents
- Patient Education as Topic
- Premature Birth