Atorvastatin Versus Placebo for Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy-A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30031572.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.037.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We tested whether intervention with atorvastatin affects the prostate beneficially compared with placebo in men with prostate cancer in a randomized clinical trial. A total of 160 statin-naïve prostate cancer patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy were randomized to use 80mg atorvastatin or placebo daily from recruitment to surgery for a median of 27 d. Blinding was maintained throughout the trial. In total, 158 men completed the follow-up, with 96% compliance. Overall, atorvastatin did not significantly lower tumor proliferation index Ki-67 or serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) compared with placebo. In subgroup analyses, after a minimum of 28 d of atorvastatin use, Ki-67 was 14.1% lower compared with placebo (p = 0.056). Among high-grade cases (International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grade 3 or higher), atorvastatin lowered PSA compared with placebo: median change -0.6 ng/ml; p = 0.024. Intraprostatic inflammation did not differ between the study arms (p = 0.8). Despite a negative overall result showing no effect of statins on Ki67 or PSA overall, in post hoc exploratory analyses, there appeared to be benefit after a minimum duration of 28 d. Further studies are needed to verify this. PATIENT SUMMARY: Cholesterol-lowering atorvastatin does not lower prostate cancer proliferation rate compared with placebo overall, but exploratory analyses suggest a benefit in longer exposure.
Medical subject headings
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Atorvastatin
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Prostatectomy
- Prostatic Neoplasms