Response to Comment on "Unexpected reversal of C<sub>3</sub> versus C<sub>4</sub> grass response to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> during a 20-year field experiment".
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30093575.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1126/science.aau1300.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Wolf and Ziska suggest that soil and species attributes can explain an unexpected 20-year reversal of C<sub>3</sub>-C<sub>4</sub> grass responses to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> This is consistent with our original interpretation; however, we disagree with the assertion that such explanations somehow render our results irrelevant for questioning a long-standing paradigm of plant response to CO<sub>2</sub> based on C<sub>3</sub>-C<sub>4</sub> differences in photosynthetic pathway.
Medical subject headings
- Carbon Dioxide
- Poaceae