Electronic clinical reminder and quality of primary diabetes care.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30219551.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.08.007.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To study the association of EMR's clinical reminder use on a comprehensive set of diabetes quality metrics in U.S. office-based physicians and within solo- versus multi-physician practices. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on visits made by adults with diabetes identified from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (2012-2014). Multiple logistic regression is used to test for associations between clinical reminder use and recommended services by the American Diabetes Association. Of 5508 visits, nationally representing 112,978,791 visits, 31% received HbA1c tests, 13% received urinalysis test, and <10% received retinal or foot exams. Main effects of practice size and clinical reminder use were found for HbA1c, urinalysis, and foot exams. We find no statistically significant relationship to suggest that clinical reminder use improve diabetes process guidelines for solo practices. Resource efforts, beyond clinical reminders, are needed to reduce gaps in primary diabetes care between solo and non-solo practices.
Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Electronic Health Records
- Office Visits
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'
- Primary Health Care
- Quality Indicators, Health Care
- Reminder Systems