Primary Triple Arthrodesis for Management of Rigid Flatfoot Deformity.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30233922.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00009 and PMC identifier 6135619.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Primary triple arthrodesis is a powerful and reliable procedure for stabilizing and correcting painful rigid flatfoot deformities with a low rate of complications. Pay careful attention to the history, physical examination, and weight-bearing radiographic studies as they are critical for selecting patients who will benefit from a triple arthrodesis. Position the patient supine on the operating table with the toes pointing straight up to the ceiling. For a standard triple arthrodesis, use 2 incisions: a lateral sinus tarsi incision, which allows exposure of the subtalar joint, CC joint, and lateral aspect of the TN joint, and a medial incision, which provides exposure of the TN joint. Ensure that joint preparation is thorough as this is critical for the success of any hindfoot arthrodesis. Reduce the TN joint first, followed by the subtalar joint, restoring a plantigrade foot and approximately 5° of hindfoot valgus alignment. Perform rigid fixation of the subtalar joint first, followed by fixation of the TN and CC joints. Accessory procedures are often required in addition to the triple arthrodesis to ensure that appropriate hindfoot alignment and a plantigrade foot are achieved. Perform a staged wound closure, taking care to maximize soft-tissue coverage over the involved hindfoot joints. Ensure that the patient follows strict non-weight-bearing precautions in the immediate postoperative period to limit micromotion at the arthrodesis sites and allow for timely fusion. In one of the largest published series of patients managed with triple arthrodesis (111 patients), Pell et al. reported a union rate of 98% at a minimum follow-up of 2 years, with 91% of patients indicating that they would be willing to repeat the procedure under similar circumstances<sup>4</sup>.
Anatomy
- foot