Holistic Approach in Patients With Presumed Lyme Borreliosis Leads to Less Than 10% of Confirmation and More Than 80% of Antibiotic Failures.

Abstract

There is no precise idea whether patients with chronic symptoms attributed to Lyme borreliosis (LB) have LB or another disease. We evaluated patients consulting for a presumed LB with a holistic approach including presumptive treatment. We included symptomatic patients consulting for presumed LB. They were classified as confirmed LB when they met four criteria, and possible LB if three with a positive clinical response to presumptive treatment. Amongst the 301 patients, 275 (91%) were exposed to tick bites, and 165 (54%) were bitten by a tick. At presentation, 151 patients (50.1%) had already been treated with a median of one (1-22) course of antimicrobials, during 34 (28-730) days. Median number of symptoms was three (1-12) with a median duration of 16 (1-68) months. Median number of signs was zero (0-2). ELISA was positive in 84/295 (28.4%) for IgM and 86/295 (29.1%) for IgG, and immunoblot was positive in 21/191 (10.9%) for IgM and 50/191 (26.1 %) for IgG. Presumptive treatment after presentation failed in 46/88 patients (52%). Diagnosis of LB was confirmed in 29 patients (9.6%), and possible in 9 (2.9%). Of the 243 patients with non-LB diagnosis, diseases were psychological, musculoskeletal, neurological or other origin in 76 (31.2%), 48 (19.7%), 37 (15.2%) and 82 (33.7%) patients respectively. Patients with other diseases were significantly younger, having more symptoms, longest duration of symptoms, less clinical signs and less frequent LB positive serologies. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of LB is worsening. Health authorities should investigate this phenomenon.