The Physician's Duty to Treat During Pandemics.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30252517.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304582 and PMC identifier 6187794.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Physicians assume a primary ethical duty to place the welfare of their patients above their own interests. Thus, for example, physicians must not exploit the patient-physician relationship for personal financial gain through the practice of self-referral. But how far does the duty to patient welfare extend? Must physicians assume a serious risk to their own health to ensure that patients receive needed care? In the past, physicians were expected to provide care during pandemics without regard to the risk to their own health. In recent decades, however, the duty to treat during pandemics has suffered from erosion even while the risks to physicians from meeting the duty has gone down. After exploring the historical evolution of the duty to treat and the reasons for the duty, I conclude that restoring a strong duty to treat would protect patient welfare without subjecting physicians to undue health risks.
Medical subject headings
- Codes of Ethics
- Communicable Disease Control
- Communicable Diseases
- Ethics, Medical
- Global Health
- Pandemics
- Physician's Role