Outcomes From a Regional Synchronous Tele-Allergy Service.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30385405.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.10.026.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Although the framework and potential benefits for using telemedicine have been described, allergy-specific outcomes are often limited or have a narrow focus. To determine the percentage of new and follow-up visits conducted via synchronous telemedicine requiring an in-person visit. A retrospective review evaluating synchronous tele-allergy appointments in a hospital-based allergy clinic was performed. A total of 360 unique patients participated in 423 synchronous tele-allergy visits from January 2016 to December 2017; 275 (65.0%) were new consultations, 54% were males, and 118 (28%) visits were for children. Allergic rhinitis (35%), asthma (24%), and food allergy (10%) represented the top 3 diagnoses. New and follow-up tele-allergy visits accounted for 13.1% (275 of 2097) and 10.4% (148 of 1426) of all outpatient visits during the study period, respectively. Sixty-five (23.4%) new patients and 14 (9.5%) follow-up patients were recommended for an in-person appointment (P < .001). Compared with follow-up tele-allergy visits, new visits were more likely to have medication prescribed (64.4% vs 49.0%; P < .002) and laboratory tests ordered (46.2% vs 7.4%; P < .001); there were no differences between new and follow-up tele-allergy visits for mean study observation period (P = .680), subsequent in-person visits conducted on the basis of provider recommendation (P = .120), or telephone consultations (P = .190). One hundred forty (33.1%) patients completed an anonymous satisfaction survey, with 98.8% of patients recommending telehealth and reporting high satisfaction. On the basis of 423 visits from 13 originating sites, patients saved an average of $485 in travel expenses, 438 driving miles, and 2.3 days of work or school per visit. Coupled with high patient satisfaction and significant time and cost savings, tele-allergy supported most of the new and follow-up visits without an in-person recommendation. Although not all tele-allergy efforts incorporate a synchronous modality with a dedicated patient presenter, allergists should continue to seek opportunities to incorporate synchronous tele-allergy with a trained patient presenter into their clinical practice.
Medical subject headings
- Hypersensitivity
- Telemedicine