Impact of a treatment escalation/limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms in patients during their last admission before in-hospital death, using the Structured Judgment Review Method.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30385448.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024264 and PMC identifier 6252685.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To assess the effect of using a treatment escalation/limitation plan (TELP) on the frequency of harms in 300 patients who died following admission to hospital. A retrospective case note review of 300 unselected, consecutive deaths comprising: (1) patients with a TELP in addition to a do-not-attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation order (DNACPR); (2) those with DNACPR only; and (3) those with neither. Patient deaths were classified retrospectively as 'expected' or 'unexpected' using the Gold Standard Framework Prognostic Indicator Guidance. Medical, surgical and intensive care units of a district general hospital. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in rates of harms, non-beneficial interventions (NBIs) and clinical 'problems' identified using the Structured Judgement Review Method. 289 case records were evaluable. 155 had a TELP and DNACPR (54%); 113 had DNACPR only (39%); 21 had neither (7%). 247 deaths (86%) were 'expected'. Among patients with 'expected' deaths and using the TELP/DNACPR as controls (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=1.00), the IRRs were: for harms, 2.99 (DNACPR only) and 4.00 (neither TELP nor DNACPR) (p<0.001 for both); for NBIs, the corresponding IRRs were 2.23 (DNACPR only) and 2.20 (neither) (p<0.001 and p<0.005, respectively); for 'problems', 2.30 (DNACPR only) and 2.76 (neither) (p<0.001 for both). The rates of harms, NBIs and 'problems' were significantly lower in the group with a TELP/DNACPR compared with 'DNACPR only' and 'neither': harms (per 1000 bed days) 17.1, 76.9 (p<0.001) and 197.8 (p<0.001) respectively; NBIs: 27.4, 92.1 (p<0.001) and 172.4 (p<0.001); and 'problems': 42.3, 146.2 (p<0.01) and 333.3 (p<0.001). The use of a TELP was associated with a significant reduction in harms, NBIs and 'problems' in patients admitted acutely and who subsequently died, especially if they were likely to be in the last year of life.
Medical subject headings
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Heart Arrest
- Hospitals, General
- Resuscitation Orders