Metabolic Subtyping of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma by <sup>18</sup>F-FDG Pharmacokinetics Using Dynamic PET/CT Scanning.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30413658.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.118.216796 and PMC identifier 6581230.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Static single-time-frame <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT is useful for the localization and functional characterization of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake varies between PPGLs with different genotypes, and the highest SUVs are observed in cases of succinate dehydrogenase (<i>SDH</i>) mutations, possibly related to enhanced aerobic glycolysis in tumor cells. The exact determinants of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG accumulation in PPGLs are unknown. We performed dynamic PET/CT scanning to assess whether in vivo <sup>18</sup>F-FDG pharmacokinetics has added value over static PET to distinguish different genotypes. <b>Methods:</b> Dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT was performed on 13 sporadic PPGLs and 13 PPGLs from 11 patients with mutations in <i>SDH</i> complex subunits B and D, von Hippel-Lindau (<i>VHL</i>), <i>RET,</i> and neurofibromin 1 (<i>NF1</i>). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a 2-tissue-compartment tracer kinetic model. The derived transfer rate-constants for transmembranous glucose flux (<i>K</i><sub>1</sub> [in], <i>k</i><sub>2</sub> [out]) and intracellular phosphorylation (<i>k</i><sub>3</sub>), along with the vascular blood fraction (V<sub>b</sub>), were analyzed using nonlinear regression analysis. Glucose metabolic rate (MR<sub>glc</sub>) was calculated using Patlak linear regression analysis. The SUV<sub>max</sub> of the lesions was determined on additional static PET/CT images. <b>Results:</b> Both MR<sub>glc</sub> and SUV<sub>max</sub> were significantly higher for hereditary cluster 1 (<i>SDHx, VHL</i>) tumors than for hereditary cluster 2 (<i>RET, NF1</i>) and sporadic tumors (<i>P</i> < 0.01 and <i>P</i> < 0.05, respectively). Median <i>k</i><sub>3</sub> was significantly higher for cluster 1 than for sporadic tumors (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Median V<sub>b</sub> was significantly higher for cluster 1 than for cluster 2 tumors (<i>P</i> < 0.01). No statistically significant differences in <i>K</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>k</i><sub>2</sub> were found between the groups. Cutoffs for <i>k</i><sub>3</sub> to distinguish between cluster 1 and other tumors were established at 0.015 min<sup>-1</sup> (100% sensitivity, 15.8% specificity) and 0.636 min<sup>-1</sup> (100% specificity, 85.7% sensitivity). MR<sub>glc</sub> significantly correlated with SUV<sub>max</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and <i>k</i><sub>3</sub> (<i>P</i> = 0.002). <b>Conclusion:</b> In vivo metabolic tumor profiling in patients with PPGL can be achieved by assessing <sup>18</sup>F-FDG pharmacokinetics using dynamic PET/CT scanning. Cluster 1 PPGLs can be reliably identified by a high <sup>18</sup>F-FDG phosphorylation rate.
Medical subject headings
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
- Paraganglioma
- Pheochromocytoma
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography