Patient-led decision making: Measuring autonomy and respect in Canadian maternity care.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30448044.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.023.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The Changing Childbirth in British Columbia study explored women's preferences and experiences of maternity care, including women's role in decision-making. Following content validation by community members, we administered a cross-sectional online survey exploring novel topics, including drivers for interventions, and experiences of autonomy, respect, or mistreatment during maternity care. Using the Mothers Autonomy in Decision-Making (MADM) scale as an outcome measure in a mixed-effects analysis, we examined differential experiences by socio-demographic and prenatal risk profile, type of care provider, interventions received, and nature of communication with care providers. A geographically representative sample of Canadian women (n = 2051) reported on 3400 pregnancies. Most women (95.2%) preferred to be the lead decision-maker during care. Patients of physicians had significantly lower autonomy (MADM) scores than midwifery clients as did women who felt pressured to accept interventions. Women who had a difference in opinion with their provider, and those who felt their provider seemed rushed reported the lowest MADM scores. Women's autonomy is significantly altered by model of maternity care, the nature of interactions with care providers, and women's ability for self-determination. If health professionals acquire skills in person-centred decision-making experience of autonomy among pregnant women may improve.
Medical subject headings
- Decision Making
- Maternal Health Services
- Patient-Centered Care
- Personal Autonomy
- Professional-Patient Relations
- Respect