The Legacy of 1987 <i>Boreali v. Axelrod</i>: Board of Health Rule-Making Under Siege.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30495990.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304755 and PMC identifier 6301384.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We explore how a 1987 New York State court decision-<i>Boreali v. Axelrod</i>-affected public health rule-making nationally and, with considerable impact, locally in New York City (NYC).We discuss the history of the origin of the NYC Board of Health (BOH), and establish that legislatures can be challenging venues in which to enact public health-related laws. We describe how, as the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene began to tackle modern public health problems (e.g., chronic diseases caused by food and tobacco), the regulatory power of its BOH was challenged.In an era when industry funds political causes and candidates, the weakening of the independence of rule-making boards of health, such as the NYC BOH, might result in illness and death.
Medical subject headings
- Governing Board
- Local Government
- Policy Making
- Public Health
- State Government