Correction to: Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer.

Houdu, Benjamin; Lasnon, Charline; Licaj, Idlir; Thomas, Guy; Do, Pascal; Guizard, Anne-Valerie; Desmonts, Cédric; Aide, Nicolas · Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging · 2019

Where this comes from

Abstract

An error occurred in the labelling of Fig. 3, where math symbols for SUV thresholds were inverted in panel b when the EARL threshold was applied to the PSF dataset and vice versa. This figure should read as follows: Fig. 3: Prognostic value of tumour SUVmax.