In utero myelomeningocoele repair and urological outcomes: the first 100 cases of a prospective analysis. Is there an improvement in bladder function?
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30548158.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/bju.14639.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the first 100 cases of in utero myelomeningocoele (MMC) repair and urological outcomes in a prospective analysis aiming to define possible improvement in bladder function. We used a protocol consisting of a detailed medical history, urinary tract ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography, and urodynamic evaluation. Patients were categorised into four groups: normal, high risk (overactive bladder with a detrusor leak-point pressure >40 cm H<sub>2</sub> O and high filling pressures also >40 cm H<sub>2</sub> O), incontinent, and underactivity (underactive bladder with post-void residual urine), and patients were treated accordingly. We evaluated 100 patients, at a mean age of 5.8 months (median 4 months), classified as high risk in 52.6%, incontinent in 27.4%, with underactive bladder in 4.2%, and only 14.7% had a normal bladder profile. Clean intermittent catheterisation was initiated in 57.3% of the patients and anticholinergics in 52.6%. Antibiotic prophylaxis was initiated in 19.1% of the patients presenting with vesico-ureteric reflux. The high incidence of abnormal bladder patterns suggests little benefit of in utero MMC surgery concerning the urinary tract.
Medical subject headings
- Fetal Therapies
- Meningomyelocele
- Ultrasonography, Prenatal
- Urodynamics
- Vesico-Ureteral Reflux