Nerve ultrasound: A reproducible diagnostic tool in peripheral neuropathy.

Telleman, Johan A; Herraets, Ingrid J T; Goedee, H Stephan; Verhamme, Camiel; Nikolakopoulos, Stavros; van Asseldonk, Jan-Thies H; van der Pol, W Ludo; van den Berg, Leonard H et al. · Neurology · 2019

prospective_cohort · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

To determine interobserver variability of nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathy in a prospective, systematic, multicenter study. We enrolled 20 patients with an acquired chronic demyelinating or axonal polyneuropathy and 10 healthy controls in 3 different centers. All participants underwent an extensive nerve ultrasound protocol, including cross-sectional area measurements of median, ulnar, fibular, tibial, and sural nerves, and brachial plexus. Real-time image acquisition was performed blind by a local and a visiting investigator (reference). Five patients were investigated using different types of sonographic devices. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated, and a random-effects model was fitted to identify factors with significant effect on interobserver variability. Systematic differences between measurements made by different investigators were small (mean difference 0.11 mm<sup>2</sup> [95% confidence interval 0.00-0.23 mm<sup>2</sup>]). Intraclass correlation coefficients were generally higher in arm nerves (0.48-0.96) than leg nerves (0.46-0.61). The hospital site and sonographic device did not contribute significantly to interobserver variability in the random-effects model. Interobserver variability of nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathy is generally limited, especially in arm nerves. Different devices and a multicenter setting have no effect on interobserver variability. Therefore, nerve ultrasound is a reproducible tool for diagnostics in routine clinical practice and (multicenter) research.