Should we screen for frailty in primary care settings? A fresh perspective on the frailty evidence base: A narrative review.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30594533.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.12.020.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
With older adults living longer, health service providers have increasingly turned their attention towards frailty and its significant consequences for health and well-being. Consequently, frailty screening has gained momentum as a possible health policy answer to the question of what can be done to prevent frailty's onset and progression. However, who should be screened for frailty, where and when remains a subject of extensive debate. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the dimensions of this question with reference to Wilson and Jungner's time-tested and widely accepted principles for acceptable screening within community settings. Although the balance of the emerging evidence to support frailty screening is promising, significant gaps in the evidence base remain. Consequently, when assessed against Wilson and Jungner's principles, extensive population screening does not appear to be supported by the evidence. However, screening for the purpose of case-finding may prove useful among older adults.
Medical subject headings
- Frailty
- Geriatric Assessment
- Mass Screening
- Primary Health Care