Association between Periprocedural Neutropenia and Early Infection-related Chest Port Removal.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30747596.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1148/radiol.2019182175.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Background Patients who require long-term central venous access can present for port placement with depressed immune function as a result of their treatment or disease process. At present, there is no consensus regarding whether neutropenia at the time of port placement confers a higher risk for early infection-related port removal. Purpose To compare the incidence of early infection-related chest port removal in adults when placed in neutropenic versus nonneutropenic patient groups. Materials and Methods This retrospective cohort study examined 2580 port placements in 1081 men (41.9%) and 1499 women (58.1%) at a single tertiary medical center between June 2007 and July 2017. Mean patient age ± standard deviation was 56 years ± 14 (range, 18-91 years). The electronic medical record was used to identify neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1500 cells/mm<sup>3</sup>) at the time of port placement and incidence of infection-related port removal. Electronic medical record follow-up was conducted for 30 days following port placement. End points were infection-related port removal or death related to port infection within 30 days. Statistical analysis compared the neutropenic (<i>n</i> = 159) and nonneutropenic (<i>n</i> = 2421) patient groups by using a χ<sup>2</sup> test for categorical data and a Student <i>t</i> test for continuous variables, with a Fisher exact test to compare incidence of port removal and death related to port infection. Results Ports placed in patients with neutropenia had an infection-related removal rate of 3.8% (six of 159) versus 0.91% (22 of 2421) in patients without neutropenia (<i>P</i> = .003). Patients with neutropenia had a port infection-related death rate of 0.63% (one of 159) versus 0.12% (three of 2421) for patients without neutropenia (<i>P</i> = .22). Conclusion Neutropenia in adults at the time of implantable subcutaneous chest port placement was associated with a higher risk for early infection-related port removal. There was no difference in the incidence of death related to port infection in neutropenic or nonneutropenic populations. © RSNA, 2019 See also the editorial by Johnson in this issue.
Medical subject headings
- Catheter-Related Infections
- Central Venous Catheters
- Device Removal
- Neutropenia