Variation in Nonsurgical Treatment Recommendations for Common Upper Extremity Conditions.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30768482.
- Also identified by DOI 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00882.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In orthopaedic surgery, there is known surgeon-to-surgeon variation in recommendations for surgery. Variation in recommendations for nonsurgical treatment of common upper extremity conditions for which surgery is discretionary remains unclear. One hundred eighty-three surgeons were included after completing six questions on six scenarios of upper extremity conditions regarding nonsurgical treatment recommendations. For one scenario, we measured the influence of reading a summary of preferred practice before making recommendations. Variation in nonsurgical treatment recommendations was observed between surgeons and between upper extremity conditions. Surgeons that reviewed a decision support paragraph were more likely to opine that surgery would eventually be beneficial. The notable variation in nonsurgical treatment recommendations indicates a substantial influence of surgeon bias in decision-making. To help ensure that decisions are consistent, surgeons may benefit from decision support and guidelines to help limit practice variation.
Medical subject headings
- Attitude of Health Personnel
- Decision Making
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Orthopedic Surgeons
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'
- Upper Extremity