Feasibility and safety of extracorporeal CO<sub>2</sub> removal to enhance protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: the SUPERNOVA study.

Combes, Alain; Fanelli, Vito; Pham, Tai; Ranieri, V Marco; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Trials Group and the “Strategy of Ultra-Protective lung ventilation with Extracorporeal CO2 Removal for New-Onset moderate to severe ARDS” (SUPERNOVA) investigators · Intensive Care Med · 2019

prospective_cohort · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

We assessed feasibility and safety of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO<sub>2</sub>R) to facilitate ultra-protective ventilation (V<sub>T</sub> 4 mL/kg and P<sub>PLAT</sub> ≤ 25 cmH<sub>2</sub>O) in patients with moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Prospective multicenter international phase 2 study. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ultra-protective ventilation with PaCO<sub>2</sub> not increasing more than 20% from baseline, and arterial pH > 7.30. Severe adverse events (SAE) and ECCO<sub>2</sub>R-related adverse events (ECCO<sub>2</sub>R-AE) were reported to an independent data and safety monitoring board. We used lower CO<sub>2</sub> extraction and higher CO<sub>2</sub> extraction devices (membrane lung cross-sectional area 0.59 vs. 1.30 m<sup>2</sup>; flow 300-500 mL/min vs. 800-1000 mL/min, respectively). Ninety-five patients were enrolled. The proportion of patients who achieved ultra-protective settings by 8 h and 24 h was 78% (74 out of 95 patients; 95% confidence interval 68-89%) and 82% (78 out of 95 patients; 95% confidence interval 76-88%), respectively. ECCO<sub>2</sub>R was maintained for 5 [3-8] days. Six SAEs were reported; two of them were attributed to ECCO<sub>2</sub>R (brain hemorrhage and pneumothorax). ECCO<sub>2</sub>R-AEs were reported in 39% of the patients. A total of 69 patients (73%) were alive at day 28. Fifty-nine patients (62%) were alive at hospital discharge. Use of ECCO<sub>2</sub>R to facilitate ultra-protective ventilation was feasible. A randomized clinical trial is required to assess the overall benefits and harms. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02282657.

Medical subject headings