Risk Factors for Compromised Surgical Resection: A Nationwide Propensity Score-Matched Study on Laparoscopic and Open Resection for Colonic Cancer.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30844971.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001304.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
High-quality surgical resection of colonic cancer, including dissection along the embryologic mesocolic plane, translates into improved long-term oncological outcomes. This study aimed to identify risk factors for compromised specimen quality and to evaluate the specimen quality of patients undergoing laparoscopic and open resection for colonic cancer. This is a retrospective observational study. This database study is based on the prospective national Danish Colorectal Cancer Database including patients undergoing intended curative elective colonic cancer surgery from January 1, 2010 through December 2013. A total of 5143 patients (1602 open resections; 3541 laparoscopic resections) with colonic cancer were included. Risk factors for poor resection quality were identified through uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The surgical approach was assessed by propensity score-matched regression analysis. Poor resection quality was defined as resections in the muscularis plane accompanied by R0 resection, or resections in any resection plane accompanied by R1 resection. Overall, 4415 (85.8%) of the resections were considered good and 728 (14.2%) were considered poor. After multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant oncological treatment, advanced tumor stage (T3-4), advancing N stage (N1-2), open tumor perforation, and open surgery significantly increased the risk of poor resection quality. In a propensity score-matched sample (n = 1508 matched pairs), matched for age, sex, ASA score, BMI, neoadjuvant treatment, tumor stage, and tumor location, open resection was still associated with a higher risk of poor resection quality compared with laparoscopic resection (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8; p = 0.002). Retrospective design was a limitation of this study. In this nationwide propensity score-matched database study, laparoscopic resection was associated with a higher probability of good resection quality compared with open resection for colonic cancer. Risk factors for compromised specimen quality were neoadjuvant oncological treatment, locally advanced tumor stage (T3-4), advanced N stage (N1-2), open tumor perforation, and open surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A830.
Medical subject headings
- Colectomy
- Colonic Neoplasms
- Laparoscopy
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Postoperative Complications