Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in low-risk patients: is it too early?
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30846526.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314248.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The median age of patients treated by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is falling across Europe, and low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) represent 80% of patients with severe AS undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). There are few data for TAVI in low-risk patients, but there are four ongoing randomised trials of SAVR versus TAVI. The key issues relate to pacemaker implantation rates and the associated potential longer term deleterious effects, and the need to minimise vascular complications and paravalvular leak. Valve leaflet thrombosis and paucity of data on valve durability remain a concern. Given the higher incidence of bicuspid aortic valves in younger patients, outcomes of TAVI in this setting need clarification and are discussed.
Medical subject headings
- Aortic Valve Stenosis
- Heart Valve Prosthesis
- Postoperative Complications
- Risk Assessment
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement