qPSMA: Semiautomatic Software for Whole-Body Tumor Burden Assessment in Prostate Cancer Using <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT.

Gafita, Andrei; Bieth, Marie; Krönke, Markus; Tetteh, Giles; Navarro, Fernando; Wang, Hui; Günther, Elisabeth; Menze, Bjoern et al. · J Nucl Med · 2019

Where this comes from

Abstract

Our aim was to introduce and validate qPSMA, a semiautomatic software package for whole-body tumor burden assessment in prostate cancer patients using <sup>68</sup>Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) 11 PET/CT. <b>Methods:</b> qPSMA reads hybrid PET/CT images in DICOM format. Its pipeline was written using Python and C++ languages. A bone mask based on CT and a normal-uptake mask including organs with physiologic <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA11 uptake are automatically computed. An SUV threshold of 3 and a liver-based threshold are used to segment bone and soft-tissue lesions, respectively. Manual corrections can be applied using different tools. Multiple output parameters are computed, that is, PSMA ligand-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV), PSMA ligand-positive total lesion (PSMA-TL), PSMA SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and PSMA SUV<sub>max</sub> Twenty <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT data sets were used to validate and evaluate the performance characteristics of qPSMA. Four analyses were performed: validation of the semiautomatic algorithm for liver background activity determination, assessment of intra- and interobserver variability, validation of data from qPSMA by comparison with Syngo.via, and assessment of computational time and comparison of PSMA PET-derived parameters with serum prostate-specific antigen. <b>Results:</b> Automatic liver background calculation resulted in a mean relative difference of 0.74% (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.996; 95%CI, 0.989;0.998) compared with METAVOL. Intra- and interobserver variability analyses showed high agreement (all ICCs > 0.990). Quantitative output parameters were compared for 68 lesions. Paired <i>t</i> testing showed no significant differences between the values obtained with the 2 software packages. The ICC estimates obtained for PSMA-TV, PSMA-TL, SUV<sub>mean</sub>, and SUV<sub>max</sub> were 1.000 (95%CI, 1.000;1.000), 1.000 (95%CI, 1.000;1.000), 0.995 (95%CI, 0.992;0.997), and 0.999 (95%CI, 0.999;1.000), respectively. The first and second reads for intraobserver variability resulted in mean computational times of 13.63 min (range, 8.22-25.45 min) and 9.27 min (range, 8.10-12.15 min), respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Highly significant correlations were found between serum prostate-specific antigen value and both PSMA-TV (<i>r</i> = 0.72, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and PSMA-TL (<i>r</i> = 0.66, <i>P</i> = 0.002). <b>Conclusion:</b> Semiautomatic analyses of whole-body tumor burden in <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT is feasible. qPSMA is a robust software package that can help physicians quantify tumor load in heavily metastasized prostate cancer patients.

Medical subject headings