Nonadherence to Insulin Therapy Detected by Bluetooth-Enabled Pen Cap Is Associated With Poor Glycemic Control.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30862650.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2337/dc18-1631.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To objectively evaluate adherence to timing and dosing of insulin by using Bluetooth pen caps and examine factors related to adherence. Bluetooth-enabled insulin pen caps were used in younger (ages 18-35 years) and older (ages ≥65 years) adults on two or more insulin injections per day. We evaluated 75 participants with diabetes, 42 younger (29 ± 4 years) and 33 older (73 ± 7 years). Nonadherence was found in 24% of bolus (Apidra) doses and 36% of basal (Lantus) doses. We divided participants into tertiles on the basis of overall adherence, with the most adherent tertile having 85% dose adherence compared with 49% in the least adherent tertile (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Participants in the most adherent tertile had better glycemic control than those in the least adherent tertile (7.7 ± 1.1% [61 ± 12 mmol/mol] vs. 8.6 ± 1.5% [70 ± 16.4 mmol/mol], <i>P</i> < 0.03). Nonadherence to insulin dosing and timing can be objectively assessed by Bluetooth pen caps and is associated with poor glycemic control.
Medical subject headings
- Blood Glucose
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Drug Delivery Systems
- Injections
- Insulin
- Insulin Glargine
- Drug Monitoring