Evaluation of fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina: can CT compete with angiography?
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30887203.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00330-019-06023-z.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We aimed to compare the performance of FFR<sub>CT</sub> and FFR<sub>QCA</sub> in assessing the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis in patients suffering from coronary artery disease with stable angina. A total of 101 stable coronary heart disease (CAD) patients with 181 lesions were recruited. FFR<sub>CT</sub> and FFR<sub>QCA</sub> were compared using invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) as a reference standard. Comparisons between FFR<sub>CT</sub> and FFR<sub>QCA</sub> were conducted based on strategies of the geometric reconstruction, boundary conditions, and geometric characteristics. The performance of FFR<sub>CT</sub> and FFR<sub>QCA</sub> in detecting hemodynamic significance was also investigated. The performance of FFR<sub>CT</sub> and FFR<sub>QCA</sub> in discriminating hemodynamically significant lesions was compared. Good correlation and agreement with invasive FFR was found using FFR<sub>CT</sub> and FFR<sub>QCA</sub> (r = 0.809, p < 0.001 and r = 0.755, p < 0.001). A significant difference was observed in the complex coronary artery tree, in which relatively better prediction was observed using FFR<sub>CT</sub> than FFR<sub>QCA</sub> when analyzing the stenosis distributed in the middle segment of a stenotic branch (p = 0.036). Moreover, FFR<sub>CT</sub> was found to be better at predicting hemodynamically insignificant stenosis than FFR<sub>QCA</sub> (p = 0.007), while the performance of the two parameters was similar in discriminating functional significant lesions using an FFR threshold of ≤ 0.8 as a reference standard. FFR<sub>CT</sub> and FFR<sub>QCA</sub> could both accurately rule out functional insignificant lesions in stable CAD patients. FFR<sub>CT</sub> was found to be better for the noninvasive screening of CAD patients with stable angina than FFR<sub>QCA</sub>. • FFR <sub>CT</sub> and FFR <sub>QCA</sub> were both in good correlation and agreement with invasive FFR measurements. • FFR <sub>CT</sub> is superior in accuracy and consistency compared to FFR <sub>QCA</sub> in patients with stenoses distributed in left coronary artery. • The noninvasive nature of FFR <sub>CT</sub> could provide potential benefit for stable CAD patients on disease management.
Medical subject headings
- Angina, Stable
- Computed Tomography Angiography
- Coronary Angiography
- Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial