Attitudes of postnatal women and maternity staff towards audio recording of consent discussions.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30973191.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1111/anae.14660.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Audio recording consent discussions, and giving a copy of the recording to the patient to keep, might improve the consent process and reduce the risk of misunderstandings, complaints or medicolegal claims. However, there may be concerns over confidentiality and how being recorded could affect the consent discussion. We ascertained the views of 50 postnatal women and 100 maternity staff (25 anaesthetists, 25 obstetricians and 50 midwives) on making audio recordings of consent discussions. There was a wide range of opinions, with women and staff similarly supportive of audio recording overall, but the women were more supportive of recording than the staff when asked if they were against it, or whether they would support recording the discussion if the patient requested it; and less concerned than the staff regarding the potential disadvantages of audio recording. There were no significant differences in the views between anaesthetists, obstetricians and midwives.
Medical subject headings
- Attitude of Health Personnel
- Informed Consent
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital
- Patient Participation
- Personnel, Hospital
- Tape Recording