Reply to "Comment on 'Lagrangian formulation and symmetrical description of liquid dynamics' ".
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 30999443.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.036103.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We make three remarks in reply to the comment by Bryk, Duviryak, and Mryglod (BDM) [Bryk, Duviryak, and Mryglod, Phys. Rev. E 99, 036102 (2019)10.1103/PhysRevE.99.036102]: (a) the discussion of shear liquid dynamics cannot be incorrect for the reason that this discussion does not include other effects such as longitudinal fluctuations; (b) the same point of relaxation time has been already discussed and published by Bryk et al. in their earlier comment [Bryk, Mryglod, Ruocco, and Scopigno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 219601 (2018)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.120.219601] and in our related reply [Yang, Dove, Brazhkin, and Trachenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 219602 (2018)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.120.219602]; and (c) the field transformation for the complex scalar field theory used by BDM is incorrect.