MEK1/2 inhibitor withdrawal reverses acquired resistance driven by BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> amplification whereas KRAS<sup>G13D</sup> amplification promotes EMT-chemoresistance.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31048689.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-09438-w and PMC identifier 6497655.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Acquired resistance to MEK1/2 inhibitors (MEKi) arises through amplification of BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> or KRAS<sup>G13D</sup> to reinstate ERK1/2 signalling. Here we show that BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> amplification and MEKi resistance are reversible following drug withdrawal. Cells with BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> amplification are addicted to MEKi to maintain a precise level of ERK1/2 signalling that is optimal for cell proliferation and survival, and tumour growth in vivo. Robust ERK1/2 activation following MEKi withdrawal drives a p57<sup>KIP2</sup>-dependent G1 cell cycle arrest and senescence or expression of NOXA and cell death, selecting against those cells with amplified BRAF<sup>V600E</sup>. p57<sup>KIP2</sup> expression is required for loss of BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> amplification and reversal of MEKi resistance. Thus, BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> amplification confers a selective disadvantage during drug withdrawal, validating intermittent dosing to forestall resistance. In contrast, resistance driven by KRAS<sup>G13D</sup> amplification is not reversible; rather ERK1/2 hyperactivation drives ZEB1-dependent epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and chemoresistance, arguing strongly against the use of drug holidays in cases of KRAS<sup>G13D</sup> amplification.
Medical subject headings
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
- Neoplasms
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)