MEK1/2 inhibitor withdrawal reverses acquired resistance driven by BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> amplification whereas KRAS<sup>G13D</sup> amplification promotes EMT-chemoresistance.

Sale, Matthew J; Balmanno, Kathryn; Saxena, Jayeta; Ozono, Eiko; Wojdyla, Katarzyna; McIntyre, Rebecca E; Gilley, Rebecca; Woroniuk, Anna et al. · Nat Commun · 2019

basic_science · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

Acquired resistance to MEK1/2 inhibitors (MEKi) arises through amplification of BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> or KRAS<sup>G13D</sup> to reinstate ERK1/2 signalling. Here we show that BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> amplification and MEKi resistance are reversible following drug withdrawal. Cells with BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> amplification are addicted to MEKi to maintain a precise level of ERK1/2 signalling that is optimal for cell proliferation and survival, and tumour growth in vivo. Robust ERK1/2 activation following MEKi withdrawal drives a p57<sup>KIP2</sup>-dependent G1 cell cycle arrest and senescence or expression of NOXA and cell death, selecting against those cells with amplified BRAF<sup>V600E</sup>. p57<sup>KIP2</sup> expression is required for loss of BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> amplification and reversal of MEKi resistance. Thus, BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> amplification confers a selective disadvantage during drug withdrawal, validating intermittent dosing to forestall resistance. In contrast, resistance driven by KRAS<sup>G13D</sup> amplification is not reversible; rather ERK1/2 hyperactivation drives ZEB1-dependent epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and chemoresistance, arguing strongly against the use of drug holidays in cases of KRAS<sup>G13D</sup> amplification.

Medical subject headings