Optimization of 4-1BB antibody for cancer immunotherapy by balancing agonistic strength with FcγR affinity.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 31105267.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-10088-1 and PMC identifier 6526162.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Costimulation of T cell responses with monoclonal antibody agonists (mAb-AG) targeting 4-1BB showed robust anti-tumor activity in preclinical models, but their clinical development was hampered by low efficacy (Utomilumab) or severe liver toxicity (Urelumab). Here we show that isotype and intrinsic agonistic strength co-determine the efficacy and toxicity of anti-4-1BB mAb-AG. While intrinsically strong agonistic anti-4-1BB can activate 4-1BB in the absence of FcγRs, weak agonistic antibodies rely on FcγRs to activate 4-1BB. All FcγRs can crosslink anti-41BB antibodies to strengthen co-stimulation, but activating FcγR-induced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity compromises anti-tumor immunity by deleting 4-1BB<sup>+</sup> cells. This suggests balancing agonistic activity with the strength of FcγR interaction as a strategy to engineer 4-1BB mAb-AG with optimal therapeutic performance. As a proof of this concept, we have developed LVGN6051, a humanized 4-1BB mAb-AG that shows high anti-tumor efficacy in the absence of liver toxicity in a mouse model of cancer immunotherapy.
Medical subject headings
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
- Immunotherapy
- Melanoma, Experimental
- Receptors, IgG
- Skin Neoplasms
- Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 9